Reference: 38 CFR 4.71a

Sources & Related Guides

What is the VA rating for Arthritis?

Understand Arthritis guidance across DC 5000-5024, one continuous 'Acute, Subacute, or Chronic Diseases' subheading: osteomyelitis (DC 5000), bone/joint tuberculosis (DC 5001), rheumatoid and other qualifying multi-joint arthritis (DC 5002), DC 5009's active-phase dispatch into DC 5002, decompression illness (DC 5011), and malignant bone neoplasm (DC 5012).

Condition Overview & Clinical Scope

DC 5000 through DC 5024 form one continuous 'Acute, Subacute, or Chronic Diseases' subheading in 38 CFR 4.71a. RatingScope's Arthritis guide covers 5 diagnostic families with real independent rating criteria: osteomyelitis (DC 5000), bone/joint tuberculosis (DC 5001, active branch), rheumatoid arthritis or other qualifying multi-joint arthritis (DC 5002), DC 5009's active-phase dispatch into DC 5002's table, and malignant bone neoplasm (DC 5012). Several other codes in this same range -- DC 5003, DC 5004-5008, DC 5010, DC 5011, and most of DC 5013-5024 -- are pure cross-references to other codes rather than independent rating tables; they are explained below but are not part of RatingScope's record comparison yet.

EXPLORE THIS CONDITION

Explore Arthritis Criteria & Tools

Save this condition to find it again later. Saved only on this device and browser. Never sent to RatingScope. Lost if you clear browser data or switch devices or browsers.

Overview

About this condition

DC 5000 through DC 5024 form one continuous 'Acute, Subacute, or Chronic Diseases' subheading in 38 CFR 4.71a. RatingScope's Arthritis guide covers 5 diagnostic families with real independent rating criteria: osteomyelitis (DC 5000), bone/joint tuberculosis (DC 5001, active branch), rheumatoid arthritis or other qualifying multi-joint arthritis (DC 5002), DC 5009's active-phase dispatch into DC 5002's table, and malignant bone neoplasm (DC 5012). Several other codes in this same range -- DC 5003, DC 5004-5008, DC 5010, DC 5011, and most of DC 5013-5024 -- are pure cross-references to other codes rather than independent rating tables; they are explained below but are not part of RatingScope's record comparison yet.

Regulatory authority: 38 CFR 4.71a, DC 5000-5024, Acute, Subacute, or Chronic Diseases

This guide explains the published criteria and common record language. It does not diagnose a condition, determine service connection, or predict a VA decision. RatingScope's Arthritis record comparison currently reviews only the 5 diagnostic families listed above. It does not compute DC 5002's Note (3) higher-evaluation comparison against chronic residuals, and it does not compute DC 5003 (the general degenerative-arthritis cross-joint fallback), DC 5011 (decompression illness), or any of the other disclosed cross-reference codes described in this guide.

Percentage Guides

Understanding Your Percentage

Select a pathway to see what the published criteria ask about, what records may clarify it, and what should not be assumed.

100%

Highest listed pathway

Several DC 5000-5024 pathways reach 100 percent: osteomyelitis of the pelvis, vertebrae, or a major joint (or with multiple sites, or a long history of intractability/debility and constitutional symptoms); active bone/joint tuberculosis; a totally incapacitating active rheumatoid-type arthritis process (or the equivalent DC 5009 presentation); and a malignant bone neoplasm.

What separates the next level: For DC 5000, the 60 percent level is frequent episodes with constitutional symptoms, without pelvis/vertebrae/major-joint/multiple-site involvement. For DC 5002 (and its DC 5009 equivalent), the 60 percent level requires weight loss and anemia with severe health impairment, or 4 or more severely incapacitating exacerbations a year, without the totally-incapacitating presentation.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
DC 5000: 'Of the pelvis, vertebrae, or extending into major joints, or with multiple localization or with long history of intractability and debility, anemia, amyloid liver changes, or other continuous constitutional symptoms.' DC 5001: 'Active.' DC 5002: 'With constitutional manifestations associated with active joint involvement, totally incapacitating.' DC 5012: flat 100 percent for a malignant primary or secondary bone neoplasm.
Qualification explanation
The specific diagnosis (osteomyelitis, bone/joint tuberculosis, rheumatoid-type arthritis, DC 5009 arthropathy, or malignant bone neoplasm) determines which 100 percent pathway applies, and the record should identify the actual documented finding rather than relying on a diagnosis label alone.
Examples
Osteomyelitis of the vertebrae with a long history of intractability and constitutional symptoms.; Active bone or joint tuberculosis.; Rheumatoid arthritis with constitutional manifestations and active joint involvement, totally incapacitating.; A malignant primary bone neoplasm.
Medical evidence
Arthritis DBQ; Imaging showing bone or joint involvement, location, and number of sites; Active/inactive tuberculosis status; Documentation of constitutional symptoms and exacerbation frequency
Functional impact examples
Symptoms severe enough to be described as totally incapacitating; Frequent flare-ups or continuous active disease
Common misconceptions
A severe-sounding diagnosis name does not by itself establish the 100 percent level.; Malignant bone neoplasm's 100 percent rating continues for 1 year after treatment ends, per DC 5012's own Note -- disclosed below, not a separate computed tier.
Related topics
osteomyelitis; bone/joint tuberculosis; rheumatoid arthritis; malignant bone neoplasm
Source context
38 CFR 4.71a; 5000, 5001, 5002, 5009, 5012; Current Acute, Subacute, or Chronic Diseases subheading.

60%

Next: 100%

Frequent osteomyelitis episodes with constitutional symptoms reach 60 percent under DC 5000. For DC 5002 (and its DC 5009 equivalent), 60 percent applies with weight loss and anemia producing severe health impairment, or 4 or more severely incapacitating exacerbations a year (or a lesser number over prolonged periods).

What separates the next level: DC 5000's 30 percent level requires a definite involucrum or sequestrum rather than frequent constitutional episodes. DC 5002's 40 percent level requires definite health impairment objectively supported by examination, or 3 or more incapacitating exacerbations a year, rather than 4 or more severely incapacitating exacerbations or weight loss/anemia.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
DC 5000: 'Frequent episodes, with constitutional symptoms.' DC 5002: 'Less than criteria for 100 percent but with weight loss and anemia productive of severe impairment of health or severely incapacitating exacerbations occurring 4 or more times a year or a lesser number over prolonged periods.'
Qualification explanation
The record should document the specific frequency and health-impact findings rather than describing symptoms only in general terms.
Examples
Osteomyelitis with frequent episodes and constitutional symptoms, but not extending into a major joint.; Rheumatoid arthritis with documented weight loss and anemia productive of severe health impairment.
Medical evidence
Arthritis DBQ; Documentation of episode frequency; Weight and lab-value (anemia) findings
Functional impact examples
Recurring flare-ups requiring ongoing management
Common misconceptions
A single severe episode is not the same as the documented frequency this level requires.
Related topics
osteomyelitis; rheumatoid arthritis
Source context
38 CFR 4.71a; 5000, 5002, 5009; Current Acute, Subacute, or Chronic Diseases subheading.

40%

Next: 60%

For DC 5002 (and its DC 5009 equivalent), 40 percent applies for symptom combinations producing definite health impairment objectively supported by examination findings, or 3 or more incapacitating exacerbations a year.

What separates the next level: The 60 percent level adds weight loss/anemia with severe health impairment, or a higher (4 or more) exacerbation frequency. The 20 percent level is limited to 1 or 2 exacerbations a year.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
DC 5002: 'Symptom combinations productive of definite impairment of health objectively supported by examination findings or incapacitating exacerbations occurring 3 or more times a year.'
Qualification explanation
The record should show objective examination support for the health impairment, or the specific exacerbation count.
Examples
Rheumatoid arthritis with objectively supported definite health impairment and 3 documented exacerbations in the past year.
Medical evidence
Arthritis DBQ; Examination findings supporting definite health impairment; Exacerbation-frequency documentation
Functional impact examples
Recurring exacerbations that objectively affect health, documented by examination
Common misconceptions
Subjective symptom descriptions alone, without examination support, do not establish this level.
Related topics
rheumatoid arthritis
Source context
38 CFR 4.71a; 5002, 5009; Current Acute, Subacute, or Chronic Diseases subheading.

30%

Next: 60%

A definite involucrum or sequestrum, with or without a discharging sinus, reaches 30 percent under DC 5000.

What separates the next level: The 20 percent level requires only a discharging sinus or other active-infection evidence within the past 5 years, without a documented involucrum or sequestrum.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
DC 5000: 'With definite involucrum or sequestrum, with or without discharging sinus.'
Qualification explanation
The record should identify the involucrum or sequestrum finding directly.
Examples
Osteomyelitis with a documented sequestrum on imaging.
Medical evidence
Imaging reports; Arthritis DBQ
Functional impact examples
Ongoing bone infection requiring monitoring or treatment
Common misconceptions
A discharging sinus alone, without an involucrum or sequestrum, describes the 20 percent level instead.
Related topics
osteomyelitis
Source context
38 CFR 4.71a; 5000; Current Acute, Subacute, or Chronic Diseases subheading.

20%

Next: 30%

A discharging sinus or other evidence of active infection within the past 5 years reaches 20 percent under DC 5000. For DC 5002 (and its DC 5009 equivalent), 1 or 2 exacerbations a year in a well-established diagnosis reaches 20 percent.

What separates the next level: DC 5000's 10 percent level requires no active infection evidence in the past 5 years. DC 5002's 40 percent level requires a higher exacerbation count or objectively supported health impairment.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
DC 5000: 'With discharging sinus or other evidence of active infection within the past 5 years.' DC 5002: 'One or two exacerbations a year in a well-established diagnosis.'
Qualification explanation
The record should document the specific finding (discharging sinus/active-infection evidence, or the exacerbation count) rather than a general diagnosis statement.
Examples
Osteomyelitis with a discharging sinus documented within the past 5 years.; A well-established rheumatoid arthritis diagnosis with 2 exacerbations documented in the past year.
Medical evidence
Arthritis DBQ; Treatment and examination records showing infection activity or exacerbation history
Functional impact examples
Periodic flare-ups that are less frequent or severe than the higher levels
Common misconceptions
Recurrent osteomyelitis is required for this level, per DC 5000's own history requirement.
Related topics
osteomyelitis; rheumatoid arthritis
Source context
38 CFR 4.71a; 5000, 5002, 5009; Current Acute, Subacute, or Chronic Diseases subheading.

10%

Next: 20%

Inactive osteomyelitis, following repeated episodes and without evidence of active infection in the past 5 years, reaches 10 percent under DC 5000.

What separates the next level: The 20 percent level requires documented active-infection evidence within the past 5 years.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
DC 5000: 'Inactive, following repeated episodes, without evidence of active infection in past 5 years.'
Qualification explanation
The record should document at least 2 prior episodes and the absence of activity in the past 5 years.
Examples
Osteomyelitis with 2 documented prior episodes and no evidence of activity in the past 5 years.
Medical evidence
Treatment history; Imaging and examination records
Functional impact examples
Residual history without current active infection
Common misconceptions
DC 5000's own Note treats this 10 percent rating as an exception to the amputation rule when the amputation rating would otherwise be 0 percent -- disclosed only, not modeled as a separate computed pathway.
Related topics
osteomyelitis
Source context
38 CFR 4.71a; 5000; Current Acute, Subacute, or Chronic Diseases subheading.

Evidence

Evidence that may clarify the published criteria

Arthritis DBQ

Shows diagnosis, examination findings, and documented severity indicators relevant to the applicable DC 5000-5024 code.

A DBQ is useful structured evidence, but RatingScope does not decide what evidence VA must accept.

Imaging reports

May clarify bone or joint involvement, location, number of sites, and findings such as involucrum or sequestrum.

Imaging severity alone does not by itself determine the DC 5000-5024 percentage.

Clinical examination and treatment notes

May document constitutional symptoms, exacerbation frequency, active-versus-inactive status, weight and lab findings, and treatment history.

A diagnosis alone does not identify a specific percentage pathway.

Personal descriptions of daily function

Can describe how flare-ups, joint symptoms, or bone-related symptoms affect daily activities.

Personal descriptions add context but do not replace the documented clinical findings required by these criteria.

Official VA Forms & DBQs

Downloadable DBQs & Supporting Claim Forms

Take the public DBQ to your private physician or review it prior to your C&P examination.

Terminology

Plain-English terms

Osteomyelitis (DC 5000)

An infection in the bone, with severity described by location, activity, and constitutional symptoms.

DC 5000's own Note treats the 10 percent inactive rating as an exception to the amputation rule, and states the 60 percent constitutional-symptoms rating is not subject to the amputation rule -- disclosed here, not modeled as a separate computed pathway.

Arthritis DBQ; imaging reports; involucrum; sequestrum; discharging sinus

Bone/joint tuberculosis, inactive (DC 5001)

Active bone/joint tuberculosis is a flat 100 percent. Inactive bone/joint tuberculosis is not computed by RatingScope -- it is a cross-reference to a different, closed set of provisions.

This is the sixth confirmed recurring instance of this active/inactive tuberculosis cross-reference pattern already tracked across this repository, alongside Eye Conditions' DC 6010, Genitourinary's DC 7505/7525, Infectious Diseases' DC 6311, and the Tuberculosis and Larynx hubs' DC 6732/DC 6515.

Arthritis DBQ; active tuberculosis; inactive tuberculosis

Rheumatoid arthritis, active process (DC 5002)

How active, incapacitating rheumatoid-type arthritis is rated while the disease process itself is active.

DC 5002's own Note (3) directs assigning the higher evaluation between this active-process rating and the rating for chronic residuals (limitation of motion, ankylosis, or DC 5003 residuals). RatingScope does not compute that comparison -- it only ever returns the active-process tier. This is a disclosed, unresolved limitation (NHD-1), not a silent assumption.

Arthritis DBQ; examination findings; exacerbations; constitutional manifestations; DC 5003

DC 5009, other specified forms of arthropathy

An active DC 5009 arthropathy is rated exactly like active rheumatoid arthritis under DC 5002. Chronic residuals are rated as DC 5003 residuals instead.

RatingScope computes only DC 5009's active-phase branch, using DC 5002's table with a distinct flag set so the source code stays traceable. DC 5009's chronic-residuals branch (DC 5003) is disclosed only, never computed, because DC 5003 itself is disclosed-only in this hub. DC 5004-5008 (5 specific infectious-arthritis types -- gonorrheal, pneumococcic, typhoid, syphilitic, and streptococcic arthritis) share this exact same active-to-5002/chronic-to-5003 dispatch note as DC 5009. Per a deliberate, explicit scope-narrowing choice -- not an oversight -- only DC 5009's active branch is computed here; DC 5004-5008 is disclosed only, even though the underlying dispatch mechanism is identical. This asymmetry is intentional: RatingScope computes only the codes explicitly named as having real independent criteria, and DC 5004-5008's own text has none beyond the shared dispatch note.

Arthritis DBQ; DC 5002; DC 5003; infectious arthritis

Degenerative arthritis cross-reference (DC 5003)

DC 5003 is not a second, separate rating that stacks on top of a joint's limitation-of-motion rating. It is a fallback that applies only in place of a limitation-of-motion rating that would otherwise be 0 percent -- one or the other, never both, for the same joint.

DC 5003's own Note (1), verbatim: "The 20 pct and 10 pct ratings based on X-ray findings, above, will not be combined with ratings based on limitation of motion." (38 CFR 4.71a, verified against eCFR and Cornell LII, 2026-08-02). This is the general fallback that many other joint-specific hubs in this repository (Knee, Hip, Shoulder/Arm, Ankle, Spine, Cervical Spine, Muscle Injuries, Amputations) already reference but have never computed -- a known, deliberately deferred scope item, matching Spine's existing DC 5003/5010 disclosure precedent. It carries zero registry rows and zero computed logic in this Arthritis hub, exactly as it does in every joint-specific hub that already references it. What changed here is the explicit disclosure of Note (1) itself: describing the dispatch mechanism (rate under the joint's own code; only if that comes out noncompensable, use DC 5003 instead) without ever naming the Note left open a real misreading -- that a documented X-ray finding of arthritis and a separately measured limitation of motion in the same joint might both be ratable. They are not; Note (1) forecloses it by name, not just by the shape of the dispatch.

imaging reports; DC 5002; DC 5009; DC 5010; limitation of motion

Post-traumatic arthritis (DC 5010)

A post-traumatic arthritis diagnosis is rated entirely under the affected joint's own code -- it has no independent table of its own.

DC 5010 is disclosed only, never computed, in this hub. Its current (post-2021) text dispatches directly to the affected joint's own hub, which this Arthritis hub does not own.

imaging reports; joint-specific DBQs; DC 5003

Decompression illness (DC 5011)

DC 5011 has no percentage table of its own -- it points to a different code depending on which body system is affected, and its own text never names which specific arthritis code applies to the musculoskeletal branch.

DC 5011 is disclosed only, never computed, in this hub -- an initial build routed the musculoskeletal branch through DC 5002, but DC 5011's own text just says 'arthritis' without naming a code. DC 5002 is titled 'Multi-joint arthritis... as an active process' (an inflammatory, multi-joint disease with systemic symptoms); DC 5003 is 'Degenerative arthritis,' the schedule's generic structural-damage fallback. Decompression illness's joint damage (for example avascular necrosis) is a degenerative/structural process, not an active multi-joint inflammatory one, so DC 5003 is the more textually and clinically defensible reading here -- but DC 5003 is itself disclosed only in this hub, so DC 5011's musculoskeletal branch has no independent computable criteria either way. The auditory, respiratory, and neurologic branches point to other body-system hubs outside Arthritis entirely and are disclosed only for the same reason any cross-hub dispatch is disclosed rather than computed.

Arthritis DBQ; specialty examination records; DC 5002; DC 5003

Malignant bone neoplasm (DC 5012)

A malignant bone tumor is rated at the highest level.

DC 5012's own Note provides that the 100 percent rating continues for 1 year following the cessation of surgical, X-ray, antineoplastic chemotherapy, or other prescribed therapeutic procedure. If there has been no local recurrence or metastasis, residuals are then rated separately. This 1-year continuation is disclosed here, not modeled as a second computed tier -- the single 100 percent row governs regardless of where in that continuation window the documented facts fall.

Arthritis DBQ; oncology records; 1-year continuation

DC 5013-5024 cross-reference range

These 9 remaining codes in the DC 5013-5024 range do not have their own independent rating tables -- they all point back to DC 5003.

DC 5018, DC 5020, and DC 5022 are confirmed removed from this range and are not addressed here. A discrepancy in the removal dates for these 3 codes across different sources (DC 5020 dated to the amending rule's publication date, the other two to its effective date) is disclosed but not resolved (NHD-4).

imaging reports; DC 5003; DC 5018; DC 5020; DC 5022

TDIU

Even if the schedular rating for Arthritis does not reach 100 percent, TDIU may still provide a pathway to compensation at the 100 percent rate, based on unemployability from this and/or other service-connected disabilities combined.

A lower schedular percentage does not by itself foreclose TDIU eligibility -- this hub computes only the schedular percentage for this specific condition and does not determine TDIU eligibility.

Employment history; vocational impact documentation; occupational impairment

Common Questions

Questions veterans commonly ask

Why does DC 5000 (osteomyelitis) have 5 different percentage levels?

DC 5000 describes 5 mutually exclusive presentations, from inactive with no recent activity (10 percent) up to pelvis, vertebrae, major-joint, or multiple-site involvement with constitutional symptoms (100 percent). The specific documented presentation, not the diagnosis alone, determines the level.

What happens if bone or joint tuberculosis (DC 5001) is inactive?

Active bone/joint tuberculosis is a flat 100 percent. Inactive bone/joint tuberculosis has no independent rating criteria in DC 5001 itself -- it directs review under 38 CFR SS4.88c and 4.89, a closed set of provisions RatingScope does not auto-compute. This is the sixth confirmed recurring instance of this exact cross-reference pattern in this repository.

Why does DC 5009 use DC 5002's table?

DC 5009 has no independent criteria of its own. Its own dispatch note routes the active phase to DC 5002's active-process table and chronic residuals to DC 5003. RatingScope computes only DC 5009's active-phase branch. DC 5004-5008 (5 specific infectious-arthritis types) share this exact same dispatch note, but are not computed here -- a deliberate scope-narrowing choice, not an inconsistency.

Why isn't DC 5003 (degenerative arthritis) computed here?

DC 5003 is the general degenerative-arthritis fallback that assigns 10 percent per major joint or minor joint group only when the joint's own limitation-of-motion rating is noncompensable. It is the same code every joint-specific hub in this repository (Knee, Hip, Shoulder/Arm, Ankle, Spine, Cervical Spine, Muscle Injuries, Amputations) already references but has never computed -- a known, deliberately deferred scope item, matching Spine's existing disclosure precedent.

If my joint has X-ray-confirmed arthritis and a separate limitation-of-motion finding, do both ratings apply?

No. DC 5003's own Note (1) states: "The 20 pct and 10 pct ratings based on X-ray findings, above, will not be combined with ratings based on limitation of motion." A joint is rated under its own limitation-of-motion code, or under DC 5003's X-ray-based percentage if that limitation-of-motion rating would otherwise be noncompensable -- never both for the same joint. This is a documented CFR rule, not a RatingScope policy choice, and it applies regardless of which joint-specific hub the limitation-of-motion rating comes from.

Does RatingScope compare the active-process rating against chronic residuals, as DC 5002's Note (3) requires?

No. DC 5002's own Note (3) directs assigning the higher evaluation between the active-process rating and the rating for chronic residuals (limitation of motion, ankylosis, or DC 5003 residuals). RatingScope does not compute that comparison -- the Arthritis evaluator only ever returns the active-process tier. This is disclosed, not silently resolved.

What about decompression illness (DC 5011)?

DC 5011 has no percentage table of its own -- it points to a different diagnostic code depending on the affected body system, and its own text does not name which specific arthritis code applies to musculoskeletal residuals. RatingScope does not compute any branch of DC 5011. For musculoskeletal residuals, DC 5003 (the general degenerative-arthritis fallback) is the more textually and clinically defensible reading than DC 5002 (a multi-joint inflammatory disease), but DC 5003 is itself disclosed only in this hub, so nothing is computed either way. Auditory, respiratory, and neurologic residuals point to other body-system hubs entirely and are disclosed only as well.

Is malignant bone neoplasm always rated 100 percent forever?

DC 5012's own Note provides that the 100 percent rating continues for 1 year following the cessation of surgical, X-ray, antineoplastic chemotherapy, or other prescribed therapeutic procedure. If there has been no local recurrence or metastasis, residuals are then rated separately. RatingScope discloses this Note but does not model a second computed tier for it.

What about DC 5013-5024 (osteoporosis, gout, bursitis, and similar conditions)?

These codes (minus DC 5018, DC 5020, and DC 5022, which are confirmed removed) are pure cross-references, rated as degenerative arthritis based on limitation of motion -- the same DC 5003 fallback described above. None of them carry independent rating criteria, and none are computed here.

If my schedular rating for Arthritis is below 100%, can I still be compensated at the 100% rate?

Possibly, through TDIU (Total Disability rating based on Individual Unemployability, 38 CFR 4.16) -- a separate pathway to 100 percent compensation based on unemployability, from this and/or other service-connected disabilities combined, independent of whether the schedular rating itself reaches 100 percent. This hub computes only the schedular percentage and does not determine TDIU eligibility.

What separates the 100% rating from adjacent levels?

For DC 5000, the 60 percent level is frequent episodes with constitutional symptoms, without pelvis/vertebrae/major-joint/multiple-site involvement. For DC 5002 (and its DC 5009 equivalent), the 60 percent level requires weight loss and anemia with severe health impairment, or 4 or more severely incapacitating exacerbations a year, without the totally-incapacitating presentation.

What separates the 60% rating from adjacent levels?

DC 5000's 30 percent level requires a definite involucrum or sequestrum rather than frequent constitutional episodes. DC 5002's 40 percent level requires definite health impairment objectively supported by examination, or 3 or more incapacitating exacerbations a year, rather than 4 or more severely incapacitating exacerbations or weight loss/anemia.

What separates the 40% rating from adjacent levels?

The 60 percent level adds weight loss/anemia with severe health impairment, or a higher (4 or more) exacerbation frequency. The 20 percent level is limited to 1 or 2 exacerbations a year.

What separates the 30% rating from adjacent levels?

The 20 percent level requires only a discharging sinus or other active-infection evidence within the past 5 years, without a documented involucrum or sequestrum.

What separates the 20% rating from adjacent levels?

DC 5000's 10 percent level requires no active infection evidence in the past 5 years. DC 5002's 40 percent level requires a higher exacerbation count or objectively supported health impairment.

What separates the 10% rating from adjacent levels?

The 20 percent level requires documented active-infection evidence within the past 5 years.

Ready when you are

Compare your documented Arthritis findings

Use documented measurements and findings when available. Do not upload records or enter sensitive identifiers.

Informational guidance only. RatingScope does not predict, decide, or guarantee VA outcomes.

Compare My Arthritis Records

Learn More

Continue Understanding

External source/reference

38 CFR 4.25 - Combined ratings table

Official source for how DC 5003's per-joint ratings, and DC 5010's multi-joint ratings, are combined rather than added.

Open 38 CFR 4.25 - Combined ratings table

Secondary conditions

Conditions commonly connected to Arthritis

No commonly documented secondary connections are tracked for Arthritis yet.

Keep going

Compare a percentage level and combined-rating math, or review evidence context.

See all tools

VA Math & Combined Ratings

Understand the whole-person method, final rounding, and bilateral limits, then calculate how percentages combine.

Open VA Math guide

Evidence Center

Understand common evidence categories and what they can clarify without treating them as a checklist.

Open Evidence Center