Reference: 38 CFR 4.97

Sources & Related Guides

What is the VA rating for Larynx, Voice, and Pharynx?

Review guidance covering DC 6516 (laryngitis, chronic, 2-tier), DC 6518 (laryngectomy, total flat 100 percent or partial fact-based residual dispatch), DC 6519 (aphonia, complete organic, 2-tier, with incomplete aphonia redirected to DC 6516), DC 6520 (larynx stenosis, 4-tier FEV-1/Flow-Volume Loop ladder, with an alternate path as aphonia), and DC 6521 (pharynx injuries, single-tier 50 percent). DC 6515 (laryngitis, tuberculous) is a pure redirect with no independent criteria.

Condition Overview & Clinical Scope

VA rates 6 diagnostic codes in this range (DC 6517 was removed October 7, 1996 and is not part of the current schedule): DC 6515 (laryngitis, tuberculous, a pure redirect with no independent criteria), DC 6516 (laryngitis, chronic, a 2-tier hoarseness-based ladder), DC 6518 (laryngectomy, total or partial), DC 6519 (aphonia, complete organic, a 2-tier ladder, with incomplete aphonia redirected to DC 6516), DC 6520 (stenosis of the larynx, a 4-tier FEV-1/Flow-Volume Loop ladder, with an alternate rating path as aphonia), and DC 6521 (pharynx, injuries to, a single-tier 50 percent rating with three bundled findings).

EXPLORE THIS CONDITION

Explore Larynx, Voice, and Pharynx Criteria & Tools

Save this condition to find it again later. Saved only on this device and browser. Never sent to RatingScope. Lost if you clear browser data or switch devices or browsers.

Overview

About this condition

VA rates 6 diagnostic codes in this range (DC 6517 was removed October 7, 1996 and is not part of the current schedule): DC 6515 (laryngitis, tuberculous, a pure redirect with no independent criteria), DC 6516 (laryngitis, chronic, a 2-tier hoarseness-based ladder), DC 6518 (laryngectomy, total or partial), DC 6519 (aphonia, complete organic, a 2-tier ladder, with incomplete aphonia redirected to DC 6516), DC 6520 (stenosis of the larynx, a 4-tier FEV-1/Flow-Volume Loop ladder, with an alternate rating path as aphonia), and DC 6521 (pharynx, injuries to, a single-tier 50 percent rating with three bundled findings).

Regulatory authority: 38 CFR 4.97, Diagnostic Codes 6515-6521

This hub explains the published DC 6515-6521 schedule and common record language. It does not diagnose any condition, determine service connection, infer undocumented findings, estimate an outcome, or replace medical care or accredited representation. IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES: (1) DC 6515 (laryngitis, tuberculous) has NO independent rating criteria -- it is a pure redirect: 'Rate under §§ 4.88c or 4.89, whichever is appropriate,' the same closed historical non-pulmonary-TB pension provision already disclosed for Tuberculosis's DC 6732. There is no live RatingScope hub for §§4.88b/4.88c/4.89; this is disclosed as out of scope, not built. (2) DC 6518 is a flat 100 percent rating ONLY for a TOTAL laryngectomy. A PARTIAL laryngectomy is not a flat tier at all -- its own text directs residuals to be rated under whichever of DC 6516 (laryngitis), DC 6519 (aphonia), or DC 6520 (stenosis) actually matches the documented finding. RatingScope asks this as a direct fact (which residual finding is documented), the same 'ask the matching/predominant criteria directly' convention already used for Genitourinary's 7 confirmed dispatches -- it never infers the match or auto-optimizes for a higher rating, and a genuinely overlapping or undocumented residual is disclosed as needing further evidence, not auto-combined. A separate footnote directs review for special monthly compensation under 38 CFR 3.350 -- disclosure-only context, never a compensation-rating criterion. (3) DC 6519's own Note directs incomplete aphonia to be evaluated as laryngitis, chronic (DC 6516) -- modeled as a direct same-hub dispatch into DC 6516's own ladder. (4) DC 6520's own Note offers an alternate rating path as aphonia, complete organic (DC 6519), with no stated rule for choosing between the two -- modeled the same way as DC 6518's residual dispatch, as a direct fact, never an inferred 'higher of the two' rating. (5) A pending VA rulemaking (RIN 2900-AQ72) proposes a heading rename and DC renumbering: DC 6515/6516/6518/6519/6521 would be pure renumbers only (to DC 6227/6228/6229/6230/6232), with NO substantive change. DC 6520 ALONE is proposed for a substantive rewrite (redesignated DC 6231), replacing the current FEV-1/Flow-Volume Loop ladder with a stenosis-percentage-based scheme (thresholds by percent airway narrowing rather than measured lung function). Not yet finalized; RatingScope does not assume how or whether it will apply.

Percentage Guides

Understanding Your Percentage

Select a pathway to see what the published criteria ask about, what records may clarify it, and what should not be assumed.

100% (DC 6518, laryngectomy, total)

Highest listed pathway

A total laryngectomy, rated flat regardless of any additional finding.

What separates the next level: A partial laryngectomy is not rated under this flat tier at all -- its residuals are rated as laryngitis, aphonia, or stenosis, whichever matches.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
6518 Laryngectomy, total -- 100
Qualification explanation
A flat 100 percent rating for a total laryngectomy, with no lower tier under this specific path.
Examples
Records document a completed total laryngectomy.
Medical evidence
Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ; Surgical records confirming total (not partial) laryngectomy
Functional impact examples
Complete surgical removal of the larynx.
Common misconceptions
The SMC-review footnote under this code addresses special monthly compensation eligibility, a separate benefit -- it does not change this code's own 100 percent compensation rating.
Related topics
dc6518-laryngectomy
Source context
38 CFR 4.97; 6518; Current DC 6518 educational pathway. A pending rulemaking (RIN 2900-AQ72) proposes a heading rename and renumber only (to DC 6229); VA's own text states no substantive change to this code.

30% (DC 6516, laryngitis, chronic)

Highest listed pathway

Hoarseness with structural cord findings: thickening, nodules, polyps, submucous infiltration, or pre-malignant biopsy changes.

What separates the next level: The 10 percent tier requires only inflammation, not the more advanced structural findings listed here.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
Hoarseness, with thickening or nodules of cords, polyps, submucous infiltration, or pre-malignant changes on biopsy -- 30
Qualification explanation
The higher of DC 6516's two tiers, requiring hoarseness plus at least one of the listed structural cord findings.
Examples
Records document chronic hoarseness with vocal cord nodules confirmed on examination.
Medical evidence
Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ; Laryngoscopy or biopsy records
Functional impact examples
Persistent hoarseness with visible structural cord changes.
Common misconceptions
This same ladder also governs DC 6518's partial-laryngectomy laryngitis-pattern residuals and DC 6519's incomplete-aphonia Note -- it is not exclusive to a standalone DC 6516 diagnosis.
Related topics
dc6518-laryngectomy; dc6519-aphonia
Source context
38 CFR 4.97; 6516; Current DC 6516 educational pathway. RIN 2900-AQ72 proposes a renumber only (to DC 6228), no substantive change.

10% (DC 6516, laryngitis, chronic)

Next: 30%

Hoarseness with inflammation of the cords or mucous membrane, without the more advanced structural findings.

What separates the next level: The 30 percent tier requires structural findings (thickening, nodules, polyps, submucous infiltration, or pre-malignant biopsy changes) beyond simple inflammation.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
Hoarseness, with inflammation of cords or mucous membrane -- 10
Qualification explanation
The lower of DC 6516's two tiers.
Examples
Records document hoarseness with inflamed vocal cords, no structural findings noted.
Medical evidence
Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ
Functional impact examples
Chronic hoarseness with mucosal inflammation.
Common misconceptions
This is a real 10 percent tier, not a residual catch-all -- DC 6516 has no explicit 0 percent row.
Related topics
dc6518-laryngectomy; dc6519-aphonia
Source context
38 CFR 4.97; 6516; Current DC 6516 educational pathway. RIN 2900-AQ72 proposes a renumber only (to DC 6228), no substantive change.

100% (DC 6519, aphonia, complete organic)

Highest listed pathway

Constant inability to communicate by speech.

What separates the next level: The 60 percent tier requires only inability to speak above a whisper, a lesser degree of speech loss.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
Constant inability to communicate by speech -- 100
Qualification explanation
The higher of DC 6519's two tiers for complete organic aphonia.
Examples
Records document complete, constant inability to communicate by speech due to organic aphonia.
Medical evidence
Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ; Speech-language pathology evaluation
Functional impact examples
Total loss of the ability to speak.
Common misconceptions
Incomplete aphonia is not a lower tier of this same code -- DC 6519's own Note redirects it to DC 6516's laryngitis ladder entirely.; The same SMC-review footnote already disclosed for DC 6518's 100 percent tier ('Review for entitlement to special monthly compensation under 38 CFR 3.350') also attaches to this DC 6519 100 percent tier -- disclosure-only context, never a compensation-rating criterion.
Related topics
dc6519-aphonia; dc6520-stenosis
Source context
38 CFR 4.97; 6519; Current DC 6519 educational pathway. RIN 2900-AQ72 proposes a renumber only (to DC 6230), no substantive change.

60% (DC 6519, aphonia, complete organic)

Next: 100%

Constant inability to speak above a whisper.

What separates the next level: The 100 percent tier requires total inability to communicate by speech, not merely a whisper-level limitation.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
Constant inability to speak above a whisper -- 60
Qualification explanation
The lower of DC 6519's two tiers.
Examples
Records document constant inability to speak above a whisper, some vocalization still possible.
Medical evidence
Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ
Functional impact examples
Severe, constant speech limitation short of total loss.
Common misconceptions
This ladder is also reused for DC 6518's partial-laryngectomy aphonia-pattern residuals and DC 6520's alternate rating path -- it is not exclusive to a standalone DC 6519 diagnosis.
Related topics
dc6519-aphonia; dc6520-stenosis
Source context
38 CFR 4.97; 6519; Current DC 6519 educational pathway. RIN 2900-AQ72 proposes a renumber only (to DC 6230), no substantive change.

100% (DC 6520, larynx stenosis)

Highest listed pathway

FEV-1 under 40 percent predicted with a Flow-Volume Loop compatible with upper airway obstruction, or a permanent tracheostomy.

What separates the next level: The 60/30/10 percent tiers step down by FEV-1 band, each still requiring a compatible Flow-Volume Loop; a permanent tracheostomy has no lower-tier equivalent.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
FEV-1 less than 40 percent of predicted value, with Flow-Volume Loop compatible with upper airway obstruction, or; permanent tracheostomy -- 100
Qualification explanation
The top tier of DC 6520's 4-tier ladder, reachable by either the severe pulmonary-function finding or, independently, a permanent tracheostomy.
Examples
Records document FEV-1 of 35 percent predicted with a Flow-Volume Loop compatible with upper airway obstruction.; Records document a permanent tracheostomy for laryngeal stenosis, independent of any FEV-1 finding.
Medical evidence
Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ; Pulmonary function testing (FEV-1, Flow-Volume Loop)
Functional impact examples
Severe airway narrowing requiring permanent surgical airway management, or documented severe obstruction on pulmonary testing.
Common misconceptions
A Flow-Volume Loop finding alone is not sufficient without the matching FEV-1 band, except when the permanent-tracheostomy path applies instead.
Related topics
dc6520-stenosis
Source context
38 CFR 4.97; 6520; Current DC 6520 educational pathway. RIN 2900-AQ72 proposes the sole substantive rewrite in this range (redesignated DC 6231), replacing this FEV-1/Flow-Volume Loop ladder with a stenosis-percentage-based scheme. Not yet finalized.

60% (DC 6520, larynx stenosis)

Next: 100%

FEV-1 of 40 to 55 percent predicted with a compatible Flow-Volume Loop.

What separates the next level: Below the 100 percent tier's under-40-percent threshold; above the 30 percent tier's 56-70 percent band.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
FEV-1 of 40- to 55-percent predicted, with Flow-Volume Loop compatible with upper airway obstruction -- 60
Qualification explanation
The second tier of the ladder.
Examples
Records document FEV-1 of 48 percent predicted with a compatible Flow-Volume Loop.
Medical evidence
Pulmonary function testing (FEV-1, Flow-Volume Loop)
Functional impact examples
Moderately severe upper airway obstruction.
Common misconceptions
The Flow-Volume Loop compatibility requirement applies at every FEV-1-based tier, not only the top tier.
Related topics
dc6520-stenosis
Source context
38 CFR 4.97; 6520; Current DC 6520 educational pathway; RIN 2900-AQ72's substantive rewrite not yet finalized.

30% (DC 6520, larynx stenosis)

Next: 60%

FEV-1 of 56 to 70 percent predicted with a compatible Flow-Volume Loop.

What separates the next level: Below the 60 percent tier's 40-55 percent band; above the 10 percent tier's 71-80 percent band.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
FEV-1 of 56- to 70-percent predicted, with Flow-Volume Loop compatible with upper airway obstruction -- 30
Qualification explanation
The third tier of the ladder.
Examples
Records document FEV-1 of 62 percent predicted with a compatible Flow-Volume Loop.
Medical evidence
Pulmonary function testing (FEV-1, Flow-Volume Loop)
Functional impact examples
Moderate upper airway obstruction.
Common misconceptions
A Flow-Volume Loop finding that is not compatible with upper airway obstruction means DC 6520's criteria are not met at any tier, regardless of the FEV-1 number alone.
Related topics
dc6520-stenosis
Source context
38 CFR 4.97; 6520; Current DC 6520 educational pathway; RIN 2900-AQ72's substantive rewrite not yet finalized.

10% (DC 6520, larynx stenosis)

Next: 30%

FEV-1 of 71 to 80 percent predicted with a compatible Flow-Volume Loop.

What separates the next level: DC 6520 has no explicit 0 percent row -- a Flow-Volume Loop not compatible with upper airway obstruction means no tier is met.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
FEV-1 of 71- to 80-percent predicted, with Flow-Volume Loop compatible with upper airway obstruction -- 10
Qualification explanation
The lowest tier of the ladder.
Examples
Records document FEV-1 of 76 percent predicted with a compatible Flow-Volume Loop.
Medical evidence
Pulmonary function testing (FEV-1, Flow-Volume Loop)
Functional impact examples
Mild upper airway obstruction.
Common misconceptions
DC 6520's own Note also permits rating as aphonia (DC 6519) as an alternate path -- RatingScope asks which finding is documented as a direct fact, it does not infer or auto-select the higher rating.
Related topics
dc6520-stenosis
Source context
38 CFR 4.97; 6520; Current DC 6520 educational pathway; RIN 2900-AQ72's substantive rewrite not yet finalized.

50% (DC 6521, pharynx, injuries to)

Highest listed pathway

Any one of three bundled findings: stricture or obstruction of the pharynx/nasopharynx, absence of the soft palate from trauma/chemical burn/granulomatous disease, or paralysis of the soft palate with swallowing difficulty and speech impairment.

What separates the next level: There is no higher or lower tier under this code -- it is a flat 50 percent once any one of the three findings is documented.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
Stricture or obstruction of pharynx or nasopharynx, or; absence of soft palate secondary to trauma, chemical burn, or granulomatous disease, or; paralysis of soft palate with swallowing difficulty (nasal regurgitation) and speech impairment -- 50
Qualification explanation
A single-tier rating -- any one of the three bundled findings independently qualifies for the same 50 percent rating; there is no lower tier and no explicit 0 percent row.
Examples
Records document soft palate paralysis with nasal regurgitation and speech impairment following a documented pharynx injury.
Medical evidence
Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ; Records documenting the specific pharynx or nasopharynx finding
Functional impact examples
Swallowing or speech impairment following documented pharynx trauma.
Common misconceptions
This is an independent diagnostic code with its own criteria, not a redirect -- confirmed directly against the live eCFR text, see RSCH-053.
Related topics
dc6521-pharynx
Source context
38 CFR 4.97; 6521; Current DC 6521 educational pathway. RIN 2900-AQ72 proposes a renumber only (to DC 6232), no substantive change.

Learn

Understand the details behind the criteria

Use these short guides to connect published terms with the records and observations that may clarify them.

DC 6515: tuberculous laryngitis has no criteria of its own

DC 6515's entire content is a redirect: 'Rate under §§ 4.88c or 4.89, whichever is appropriate.' This is the same closed, historical, pre-1968 TB-pension provision already documented for Tuberculosis's DC 6732.

  • Sections 4.88c and 4.89 govern a narrow, closed population of veterans whose non-pulmonary tuberculosis entitlement was established before August 19, 1968, tied to a repealed statute (Public Law 90-493).
  • There is no live RatingScope hub for §§4.88b/4.88c/4.89 -- disclosed as out of scope, not built, since these sections have never themselves been the subject of a dedicated research pass in this repository.
  • This is disclosure-only context, not a navigable cross-link, matching the same treatment already given to Tuberculosis's DC 6732.

Records to review: Historical entitlement records.

DC 6518: total laryngectomy is flat 100 percent; partial laryngectomy is not

A total laryngectomy is a flat 100 percent rating. A partial laryngectomy's residuals are rated entirely under whichever of DC 6516 (laryngitis), DC 6519 (aphonia), or DC 6520 (stenosis) actually matches the documented finding -- it is not itself a flat tier.

  • RatingScope asks which residual finding is documented as a direct fact (laryngitis pattern, aphonia pattern, or stenosis pattern), the same convention already used for Genitourinary's 7 confirmed 'whichever is predominant' dispatches -- it never infers the match or optimizes for the higher rating.
  • If records document more than one residual pattern at once, or the specific residual is not yet documented, this is disclosed as needing further evidence rather than combined into an invented formula.
  • A separate footnote directs review for special monthly compensation eligibility under 38 CFR 3.350 -- a distinct benefit determination, disclosed as context only, never a compensation-rating criterion.
  • This finding (that DC 6518 is not simply a flat-rate code) was confirmed by a dedicated verbatim re-check (RSCH-053) after an earlier summary had understated its complexity.

Records to review: Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ; Surgical records documenting total vs. partial laryngectomy and the specific residual finding.

DC 6519: complete organic aphonia, with incomplete aphonia redirected to DC 6516

DC 6519 covers complete organic aphonia at two tiers (100 percent for constant inability to communicate by speech, 60 percent for constant inability to speak above a whisper). Its own Note directs incomplete aphonia to be evaluated as laryngitis, chronic (DC 6516) instead.

  • 'Incomplete' aphonia is not a lower tier of DC 6519 -- it is rated entirely under DC 6516's own hoarseness-based ladder, a direct same-hub dispatch.
  • RatingScope asks completeness (complete vs. incomplete) as its own direct fact before determining which ladder applies.

Records to review: Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ; Speech-language pathology evaluation.

DC 6520: larynx stenosis's 4-tier ladder, with an alternate path as aphonia

DC 6520 rates larynx stenosis by a 4-tier FEV-1/Flow-Volume Loop ladder (100/60/30/10 percent), with the 100 percent tier alternately satisfied by a permanent tracheostomy. Its own Note also permits rating as aphonia (DC 6519) instead, with no stated rule for choosing between the two paths.

  • Every FEV-1-based tier also requires the Flow-Volume Loop to be compatible with upper airway obstruction -- an FEV-1 number alone, without that compatibility finding, does not establish a tier.
  • RatingScope asks which criteria the documented findings match (stenosis findings vs. aphonia findings) as a direct fact, the same convention used for DC 6518's partial-laryngectomy dispatch -- never an inferred 'higher of the two' selection.
  • A pending VA rulemaking (RIN 2900-AQ72) proposes the sole substantive rewrite in this entire code range for DC 6520 specifically: a stenosis-percentage-based scheme replacing the current FEV-1/Flow-Volume Loop measurements. Not yet finalized.

Records to review: Pulmonary function testing (FEV-1, Flow-Volume Loop); Records documenting permanent tracheostomy, if applicable.

DC 6521: pharynx injuries, an independent single-tier code

DC 6521 rates pharynx injuries at a flat 50 percent when any one of three bundled findings is documented: stricture or obstruction of the pharynx/nasopharynx, absence of the soft palate from trauma/chemical burn/granulomatous disease, or paralysis of the soft palate with swallowing difficulty and speech impairment.

  • This is confirmed independent rating criteria, not a redirect -- a dedicated verbatim re-check (RSCH-053) corrected an earlier log entry that had mistakenly grouped DC 6521 with DC 6515's tuberculosis-provision redirect.
  • Any one of the three findings independently qualifies -- they are not required to appear together.

Records to review: Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ; Records documenting the specific pharynx or nasopharynx finding.

Evidence

Evidence that may clarify the published criteria

Records documenting the specific diagnosis (laryngitis, laryngectomy, aphonia, stenosis, tuberculous laryngitis, or pharynx injury)

Determines which of the six DC 6515-6521 pathways applies.

Most claims fall clearly under one diagnosis label.

Pulmonary function testing (FEV-1, Flow-Volume Loop)

Needed for DC 6520's stenosis ladder, and for DC 6518's partial-laryngectomy residual dispatch when a stenosis pattern is documented.

Only relevant when stenosis findings, not aphonia or laryngitis findings, are documented.

Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx Disability Benefits Questionnaire

The standardized VA exam form covering laryngitis, laryngectomy, aphonia, and stenosis findings in this hub, via its Section 6 modules.

A DBQ is one common evidence source, not the only way to document these findings.

Official VA Forms & DBQs

Downloadable DBQs & Supporting Claim Forms

Take the public DBQ to your private physician or review it prior to your C&P examination.

Terminology

Plain-English terms

Flow-Volume Loop

A breathing test that shows whether the shape of your airflow pattern matches what's typically seen with a narrowed upper airway.

Required alongside the FEV-1 percentage at every tier of DC 6520's stenosis ladder -- an FEV-1 number alone is not sufficient.

Pulmonary function testing; dc6520-stenosis

Incomplete aphonia

Partial, rather than total, loss of the ability to speak, rated under the laryngitis criteria instead of the aphonia criteria.

Determines whether DC 6519's own 2-tier ladder or DC 6516's own 2-tier ladder governs the rating.

Speech-language pathology evaluation; dc6519-aphonia

TDIU

Even if the schedular rating for Larynx, Voice, and Pharynx does not reach 100 percent, TDIU may still provide a pathway to compensation at the 100 percent rate, based on unemployability from this and/or other service-connected disabilities combined.

A lower schedular percentage does not by itself foreclose TDIU eligibility -- this hub computes only the schedular percentage for this specific condition and does not determine TDIU eligibility.

Employment history; vocational impact documentation; occupational impairment

Common Questions

Questions veterans commonly ask

How does VA rate chronic laryngitis?

DC 6516 provides a 2-tier ladder: 30 percent for hoarseness with structural cord findings (thickening, nodules, polyps, submucous infiltration, or pre-malignant biopsy changes), or 10 percent for hoarseness with cord or mucous-membrane inflammation alone.

Is every laryngectomy rated at 100 percent?

No -- only a total laryngectomy is a flat 100 percent rating. A partial laryngectomy's residuals are rated entirely under whichever of DC 6516 (laryngitis), DC 6519 (aphonia), or DC 6520 (stenosis) matches your documented finding, asked as a direct fact.

What's the difference between complete and incomplete aphonia?

Complete organic aphonia is rated under DC 6519's own 2-tier ladder (100 percent for constant inability to communicate by speech, 60 percent for constant inability to speak above a whisper). DC 6519's own Note directs incomplete aphonia to be evaluated as laryngitis, chronic (DC 6516) instead.

How is larynx stenosis rated?

DC 6520 provides a 4-tier FEV-1/Flow-Volume Loop ladder (100/60/30/10 percent), with the 100 percent tier alternately reachable by a permanent tracheostomy. Its own Note also allows rating as aphonia (DC 6519) instead, asked as a direct fact rather than an inferred higher-rating optimization.

How is tuberculous laryngitis rated?

DC 6515 has no independent rating criteria -- it redirects to §§4.88c or 4.89, whichever is appropriate, a closed historical non-pulmonary-TB pension provision. RatingScope discloses this as out of scope; there is no live target hub to link to.

How are pharynx injuries rated?

DC 6521 provides a flat 50 percent rating when any one of three findings is documented: stricture or obstruction of the pharynx/nasopharynx, absence of the soft palate from trauma/chemical burn/granulomatous disease, or paralysis of the soft palate with swallowing difficulty and speech impairment. This is an independent code with its own criteria, not a redirect.

If my schedular rating for Larynx, Voice, and Pharynx is below 100%, can I still be compensated at the 100% rate?

Possibly, through TDIU (Total Disability rating based on Individual Unemployability, 38 CFR 4.16) -- a separate pathway to 100 percent compensation based on unemployability, from this and/or other service-connected disabilities combined, independent of whether the schedular rating itself reaches 100 percent. This hub computes only the schedular percentage and does not determine TDIU eligibility.

What separates the 100% (DC 6518, laryngectomy, total) rating from adjacent levels?

A partial laryngectomy is not rated under this flat tier at all -- its residuals are rated as laryngitis, aphonia, or stenosis, whichever matches.

What separates the 30% (DC 6516, laryngitis, chronic) rating from adjacent levels?

The 10 percent tier requires only inflammation, not the more advanced structural findings listed here.

What separates the 10% (DC 6516, laryngitis, chronic) rating from adjacent levels?

The 30 percent tier requires structural findings (thickening, nodules, polyps, submucous infiltration, or pre-malignant biopsy changes) beyond simple inflammation.

What separates the 100% (DC 6519, aphonia, complete organic) rating from adjacent levels?

The 60 percent tier requires only inability to speak above a whisper, a lesser degree of speech loss.

What separates the 60% (DC 6519, aphonia, complete organic) rating from adjacent levels?

The 100 percent tier requires total inability to communicate by speech, not merely a whisper-level limitation.

What separates the 100% (DC 6520, larynx stenosis) rating from adjacent levels?

The 60/30/10 percent tiers step down by FEV-1 band, each still requiring a compatible Flow-Volume Loop; a permanent tracheostomy has no lower-tier equivalent.

What separates the 60% (DC 6520, larynx stenosis) rating from adjacent levels?

Below the 100 percent tier's under-40-percent threshold; above the 30 percent tier's 56-70 percent band.

What separates the 30% (DC 6520, larynx stenosis) rating from adjacent levels?

Below the 60 percent tier's 40-55 percent band; above the 10 percent tier's 71-80 percent band.

What separates the 10% (DC 6520, larynx stenosis) rating from adjacent levels?

DC 6520 has no explicit 0 percent row -- a Flow-Volume Loop not compatible with upper airway obstruction means no tier is met.

What separates the 50% (DC 6521, pharynx, injuries to) rating from adjacent levels?

There is no higher or lower tier under this code -- it is a flat 50 percent once any one of the three findings is documented.

Ready when you are

Compare documented larynx, voice, and pharynx condition findings

Use the diagnosis, extent of laryngectomy or stenosis, and functional-severity language already documented in your records. Do not upload records or enter Social Security numbers, claim numbers, full dates of birth, or other sensitive identifiers. RatingScope does not infer missing findings.

Informational guidance only. RatingScope does not predict, decide, or guarantee VA outcomes.

Compare my larynx, voice, or pharynx condition records

Learn More

Continue Understanding

Secondary conditions

Conditions commonly connected to Larynx, Voice, and Pharynx

No commonly documented secondary connections are tracked for Larynx, Voice, and Pharynx yet.

Keep going

Compare a percentage level and combined-rating math, or review evidence context.

See all tools

VA Math & Combined Ratings

Understand the whole-person method, final rounding, and bilateral limits, then calculate how percentages combine.

Open VA Math guide

Evidence Center

Understand common evidence categories and what they can clarify without treating them as a checklist.

Open Evidence Center