100% (DC 6518, laryngectomy, total)
Highest listed pathwayA total laryngectomy, rated flat regardless of any additional finding.
What separates the next level: A partial laryngectomy is not rated under this flat tier at all -- its residuals are rated as laryngitis, aphonia, or stenosis, whichever matches.
Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
- Official CFR language
- 6518 Laryngectomy, total -- 100
- Qualification explanation
- A flat 100 percent rating for a total laryngectomy, with no lower tier under this specific path.
- Examples
- Records document a completed total laryngectomy.
- Medical evidence
- Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ; Surgical records confirming total (not partial) laryngectomy
- Functional impact examples
- Complete surgical removal of the larynx.
- Common misconceptions
- The SMC-review footnote under this code addresses special monthly compensation eligibility, a separate benefit -- it does not change this code's own 100 percent compensation rating.
- Related topics
- dc6518-laryngectomy
- Source context
- 38 CFR 4.97; 6518; Current DC 6518 educational pathway. A pending rulemaking (RIN 2900-AQ72) proposes a heading rename and renumber only (to DC 6229); VA's own text states no substantive change to this code.
30% (DC 6516, laryngitis, chronic)
Highest listed pathwayHoarseness with structural cord findings: thickening, nodules, polyps, submucous infiltration, or pre-malignant biopsy changes.
What separates the next level: The 10 percent tier requires only inflammation, not the more advanced structural findings listed here.
Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
- Official CFR language
- Hoarseness, with thickening or nodules of cords, polyps, submucous infiltration, or pre-malignant changes on biopsy -- 30
- Qualification explanation
- The higher of DC 6516's two tiers, requiring hoarseness plus at least one of the listed structural cord findings.
- Examples
- Records document chronic hoarseness with vocal cord nodules confirmed on examination.
- Medical evidence
- Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ; Laryngoscopy or biopsy records
- Functional impact examples
- Persistent hoarseness with visible structural cord changes.
- Common misconceptions
- This same ladder also governs DC 6518's partial-laryngectomy laryngitis-pattern residuals and DC 6519's incomplete-aphonia Note -- it is not exclusive to a standalone DC 6516 diagnosis.
- Related topics
- dc6518-laryngectomy; dc6519-aphonia
- Source context
- 38 CFR 4.97; 6516; Current DC 6516 educational pathway. RIN 2900-AQ72 proposes a renumber only (to DC 6228), no substantive change.
10% (DC 6516, laryngitis, chronic)
Next: 30%Hoarseness with inflammation of the cords or mucous membrane, without the more advanced structural findings.
What separates the next level: The 30 percent tier requires structural findings (thickening, nodules, polyps, submucous infiltration, or pre-malignant biopsy changes) beyond simple inflammation.
Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
- Official CFR language
- Hoarseness, with inflammation of cords or mucous membrane -- 10
- Qualification explanation
- The lower of DC 6516's two tiers.
- Examples
- Records document hoarseness with inflamed vocal cords, no structural findings noted.
- Medical evidence
- Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ
- Functional impact examples
- Chronic hoarseness with mucosal inflammation.
- Common misconceptions
- This is a real 10 percent tier, not a residual catch-all -- DC 6516 has no explicit 0 percent row.
- Related topics
- dc6518-laryngectomy; dc6519-aphonia
- Source context
- 38 CFR 4.97; 6516; Current DC 6516 educational pathway. RIN 2900-AQ72 proposes a renumber only (to DC 6228), no substantive change.
100% (DC 6519, aphonia, complete organic)
Highest listed pathwayConstant inability to communicate by speech.
What separates the next level: The 60 percent tier requires only inability to speak above a whisper, a lesser degree of speech loss.
Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
- Official CFR language
- Constant inability to communicate by speech -- 100
- Qualification explanation
- The higher of DC 6519's two tiers for complete organic aphonia.
- Examples
- Records document complete, constant inability to communicate by speech due to organic aphonia.
- Medical evidence
- Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ; Speech-language pathology evaluation
- Functional impact examples
- Total loss of the ability to speak.
- Common misconceptions
- Incomplete aphonia is not a lower tier of this same code -- DC 6519's own Note redirects it to DC 6516's laryngitis ladder entirely.; The same SMC-review footnote already disclosed for DC 6518's 100 percent tier ('Review for entitlement to special monthly compensation under 38 CFR 3.350') also attaches to this DC 6519 100 percent tier -- disclosure-only context, never a compensation-rating criterion.
- Related topics
- dc6519-aphonia; dc6520-stenosis
- Source context
- 38 CFR 4.97; 6519; Current DC 6519 educational pathway. RIN 2900-AQ72 proposes a renumber only (to DC 6230), no substantive change.
60% (DC 6519, aphonia, complete organic)
Next: 100%Constant inability to speak above a whisper.
What separates the next level: The 100 percent tier requires total inability to communicate by speech, not merely a whisper-level limitation.
Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
- Official CFR language
- Constant inability to speak above a whisper -- 60
- Qualification explanation
- The lower of DC 6519's two tiers.
- Examples
- Records document constant inability to speak above a whisper, some vocalization still possible.
- Medical evidence
- Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ
- Functional impact examples
- Severe, constant speech limitation short of total loss.
- Common misconceptions
- This ladder is also reused for DC 6518's partial-laryngectomy aphonia-pattern residuals and DC 6520's alternate rating path -- it is not exclusive to a standalone DC 6519 diagnosis.
- Related topics
- dc6519-aphonia; dc6520-stenosis
- Source context
- 38 CFR 4.97; 6519; Current DC 6519 educational pathway. RIN 2900-AQ72 proposes a renumber only (to DC 6230), no substantive change.
100% (DC 6520, larynx stenosis)
Highest listed pathwayFEV-1 under 40 percent predicted with a Flow-Volume Loop compatible with upper airway obstruction, or a permanent tracheostomy.
What separates the next level: The 60/30/10 percent tiers step down by FEV-1 band, each still requiring a compatible Flow-Volume Loop; a permanent tracheostomy has no lower-tier equivalent.
Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
- Official CFR language
- FEV-1 less than 40 percent of predicted value, with Flow-Volume Loop compatible with upper airway obstruction, or; permanent tracheostomy -- 100
- Qualification explanation
- The top tier of DC 6520's 4-tier ladder, reachable by either the severe pulmonary-function finding or, independently, a permanent tracheostomy.
- Examples
- Records document FEV-1 of 35 percent predicted with a Flow-Volume Loop compatible with upper airway obstruction.; Records document a permanent tracheostomy for laryngeal stenosis, independent of any FEV-1 finding.
- Medical evidence
- Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ; Pulmonary function testing (FEV-1, Flow-Volume Loop)
- Functional impact examples
- Severe airway narrowing requiring permanent surgical airway management, or documented severe obstruction on pulmonary testing.
- Common misconceptions
- A Flow-Volume Loop finding alone is not sufficient without the matching FEV-1 band, except when the permanent-tracheostomy path applies instead.
- Related topics
- dc6520-stenosis
- Source context
- 38 CFR 4.97; 6520; Current DC 6520 educational pathway. RIN 2900-AQ72 proposes the sole substantive rewrite in this range (redesignated DC 6231), replacing this FEV-1/Flow-Volume Loop ladder with a stenosis-percentage-based scheme. Not yet finalized.
60% (DC 6520, larynx stenosis)
Next: 100%FEV-1 of 40 to 55 percent predicted with a compatible Flow-Volume Loop.
What separates the next level: Below the 100 percent tier's under-40-percent threshold; above the 30 percent tier's 56-70 percent band.
Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
- Official CFR language
- FEV-1 of 40- to 55-percent predicted, with Flow-Volume Loop compatible with upper airway obstruction -- 60
- Qualification explanation
- The second tier of the ladder.
- Examples
- Records document FEV-1 of 48 percent predicted with a compatible Flow-Volume Loop.
- Medical evidence
- Pulmonary function testing (FEV-1, Flow-Volume Loop)
- Functional impact examples
- Moderately severe upper airway obstruction.
- Common misconceptions
- The Flow-Volume Loop compatibility requirement applies at every FEV-1-based tier, not only the top tier.
- Related topics
- dc6520-stenosis
- Source context
- 38 CFR 4.97; 6520; Current DC 6520 educational pathway; RIN 2900-AQ72's substantive rewrite not yet finalized.
30% (DC 6520, larynx stenosis)
Next: 60%FEV-1 of 56 to 70 percent predicted with a compatible Flow-Volume Loop.
What separates the next level: Below the 60 percent tier's 40-55 percent band; above the 10 percent tier's 71-80 percent band.
Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
- Official CFR language
- FEV-1 of 56- to 70-percent predicted, with Flow-Volume Loop compatible with upper airway obstruction -- 30
- Qualification explanation
- The third tier of the ladder.
- Examples
- Records document FEV-1 of 62 percent predicted with a compatible Flow-Volume Loop.
- Medical evidence
- Pulmonary function testing (FEV-1, Flow-Volume Loop)
- Functional impact examples
- Moderate upper airway obstruction.
- Common misconceptions
- A Flow-Volume Loop finding that is not compatible with upper airway obstruction means DC 6520's criteria are not met at any tier, regardless of the FEV-1 number alone.
- Related topics
- dc6520-stenosis
- Source context
- 38 CFR 4.97; 6520; Current DC 6520 educational pathway; RIN 2900-AQ72's substantive rewrite not yet finalized.
10% (DC 6520, larynx stenosis)
Next: 30%FEV-1 of 71 to 80 percent predicted with a compatible Flow-Volume Loop.
What separates the next level: DC 6520 has no explicit 0 percent row -- a Flow-Volume Loop not compatible with upper airway obstruction means no tier is met.
Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
- Official CFR language
- FEV-1 of 71- to 80-percent predicted, with Flow-Volume Loop compatible with upper airway obstruction -- 10
- Qualification explanation
- The lowest tier of the ladder.
- Examples
- Records document FEV-1 of 76 percent predicted with a compatible Flow-Volume Loop.
- Medical evidence
- Pulmonary function testing (FEV-1, Flow-Volume Loop)
- Functional impact examples
- Mild upper airway obstruction.
- Common misconceptions
- DC 6520's own Note also permits rating as aphonia (DC 6519) as an alternate path -- RatingScope asks which finding is documented as a direct fact, it does not infer or auto-select the higher rating.
- Related topics
- dc6520-stenosis
- Source context
- 38 CFR 4.97; 6520; Current DC 6520 educational pathway; RIN 2900-AQ72's substantive rewrite not yet finalized.
50% (DC 6521, pharynx, injuries to)
Highest listed pathwayAny one of three bundled findings: stricture or obstruction of the pharynx/nasopharynx, absence of the soft palate from trauma/chemical burn/granulomatous disease, or paralysis of the soft palate with swallowing difficulty and speech impairment.
What separates the next level: There is no higher or lower tier under this code -- it is a flat 50 percent once any one of the three findings is documented.
Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
- Official CFR language
- Stricture or obstruction of pharynx or nasopharynx, or; absence of soft palate secondary to trauma, chemical burn, or granulomatous disease, or; paralysis of soft palate with swallowing difficulty (nasal regurgitation) and speech impairment -- 50
- Qualification explanation
- A single-tier rating -- any one of the three bundled findings independently qualifies for the same 50 percent rating; there is no lower tier and no explicit 0 percent row.
- Examples
- Records document soft palate paralysis with nasal regurgitation and speech impairment following a documented pharynx injury.
- Medical evidence
- Sinusitis/Rhinitis and Other Conditions of the Nose, Throat, Larynx and Pharynx DBQ; Records documenting the specific pharynx or nasopharynx finding
- Functional impact examples
- Swallowing or speech impairment following documented pharynx trauma.
- Common misconceptions
- This is an independent diagnostic code with its own criteria, not a redirect -- confirmed directly against the live eCFR text, see RSCH-053.
- Related topics
- dc6521-pharynx
- Source context
- 38 CFR 4.97; 6521; Current DC 6521 educational pathway. RIN 2900-AQ72 proposes a renumber only (to DC 6232), no substantive change.