DBQ & C&P Exam Guides
Shoulder DBQ and C&P Exam Guide: Goniometer Testing and Functional Loss
VA shoulder C&P exams evaluate flexion, abduction, and rotation using a goniometer under 38 CFR 4.71a. Examiners assess pain onset, active and passive motion, flare-ups, and functional loss.
Go directly to the official source
This page explains a concept. It is not the current, authoritative list. Confirm details directly with VA before relying on anything here.
Goniometer measurement and motion planes
The VA Shoulder and Arm DBQ requires the examiner to measure arm movement across several planes using a mechanical goniometer. Primary planes evaluated under Diagnostic Code 5201 include forward flexion (raising the arm forward and up) and abduction (raising the arm away from the side). Full normal shoulder range of motion is 180 degrees in both flexion and abduction. The examiner also records internal and external rotation and cross-body adduction.
Documenting pain onset versus motion endpoints
Range of motion testing does not universally stop at the first report of discomfort. Under 38 CFR 4.59, the examiner must document the point where pain begins as well as the point where motion actually ends. Active motion (moved by the veteran) and passive motion (moved by the examiner) may both be assessed to identify mechanical blocks, muscle guarding, or true capsular restriction. Documenting when pain begins establishes painful motion even if movement continues.
Repetitive motion, fatigue, and flare-up estimations
Under 38 CFR 4.40 and 4.45 (the DeLuca doctrine), joint disability is not judged solely by an unburdened, single movement. The examiner must assess whether repetitive motion causes additional limitation due to pain, weakness, fatigue, or incoordination. When an active flare-up is not occurring during the appointment, the examiner is required by Mitchell v. Shinseki to provide an informed medical estimate of the veteran's functional loss during typical flare-ups.
Dominant arm versus nondominant arm ratings
The rating schedule under 38 CFR 4.71a explicitly differentiates between the major (dominant) extremity and minor (nondominant) extremity. Because losing function in the dominant arm produces greater occupational and functional disruption, higher disability ratings are assigned to the dominant side across several limitation of motion and instability thresholds. The DBQ documents handedness to ensure the proper column is applied during adjudication.
Evaluating structural stability, impingement, and strength
The DBQ includes physical provocative maneuvers such as the Hawkins-Kennedy and Neer impingement tests, cross-body adduction for acromioclavicular (AC) joint pathology, and apprehension testing for anterior or posterior instability. Muscle strength is graded on a standard 0 to 5 scale for biceps, triceps, deltoids, and rotator cuff groups, documenting any motor weakness or localized atrophy.
Related condition guides
Explore published rating criteria, evidence requirements, and diagnostic codes for related conditions.
Related guides
NEXT DIRECTIVE // PUT THIS GUIDANCE INTO ACTION
What would you like to do next?
Compare Your Medical Records
Test your symptoms and evidence against published 38 CFR criteria.
Add to Your Claim Summary
Track this condition and calculate your whole-person combined rating.
Calculate Combined Rating
See how multiple disability ratings combine under 38 CFR §4.25.