Reference: 38 CFR 4.71a

Sources & Related Guides

What is the VA rating for Elbow / Forearm?

Understand elbow and forearm guidance around dominant versus nondominant side, elbow flexion and extension, forearm pronation and supination, ankylosis, radius or ulna impairment, painful motion, and functional loss.

Condition Overview & Clinical Scope

The published elbow and forearm schedule uses several separate pathways. Some focus on elbow bending and straightening. Others focus on forearm rotation, ankylosis, radius or ulna impairment, flail joint, fracture deformity, or elbow replacement residuals. The dominant arm can matter because several levels distinguish the major and minor extremity.

EXPLORE THIS CONDITION

Explore Elbow / Forearm Criteria & Tools

Save this condition to find it again later. Saved only on this device and browser. Never sent to RatingScope. Lost if you clear browser data or switch devices or browsers.

Overview

About this condition

The published elbow and forearm schedule uses several separate pathways. Some focus on elbow bending and straightening. Others focus on forearm rotation, ankylosis, radius or ulna impairment, flail joint, fracture deformity, or elbow replacement residuals. The dominant arm can matter because several levels distinguish the major and minor extremity.

Regulatory authority: 38 CFR 4.71a, DC 5052 and DC 5205-5213

IMPORTANT DISCLOSURE: the Note following DC 5213 requires that multiple impaired finger movements (due to tendon tie-up, muscle, or nerve injury) arising alongside an elbow/forearm finding be separately rated and combined, but capped at DC 5125's loss-of-use-of-hand figure -- see the Hand/Fingers hub for that code's own content. This guide is educational only. RatingScope does not diagnose an elbow or forearm condition, does not infer missing measurements, does not determine service connection, and does not predict a VA decision.

Percentage Guides

Understanding Your Percentage

Select a pathway to see what the published criteria ask about, what records may clarify it, and what should not be assumed.

0%

Next: 10%

A 0% elbow flexion pathway appears when forearm flexion is limited to 110 degrees under DC 5206.

What separates the next level: The next flexion level asks whether flexion is limited to 100 degrees. Other elbow and forearm routes use different findings.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
DC 5206 lists forearm flexion limited to 110 degrees at 0 percent for either extremity.
Qualification explanation
This pathway still needs a documented flexion measurement. Missing elbow motion should be treated as missing detail, not converted into a 0% pathway.
Examples
The Elbow and Forearm DBQ records flexion limited to 110 degrees.; A clinician records limited elbow bending but not enough limitation for a compensable flexion pathway.; No ankylosis, structural bone impairment, or qualifying rotation finding is documented.
Medical evidence
Elbow and Forearm DBQ; Clinician-recorded flexion measurement; Physical therapy range-of-motion notes
Functional impact examples
Pain or activity limits may still be real even when a specific route is noncompensable.; Lifting, carrying, dressing, or grooming limits can provide context but should not replace the measured criterion.
Common misconceptions
0% is not a statement that the elbow problem is unimportant.; A missing measurement is not the same as a noncompensable measurement.; Diagnosis names do not replace the published measurement pathway.
Related topics
flexion; noncompensable pathway; range of motion
Source context
38 CFR 4.71a; 5206; Current educational Elbow / Forearm guide; deterministic assessment support is not active.

10%

Next: 20%

The 10% level can appear when flexion is limited to 100 degrees, extension is limited to 45 or 60 degrees, supination is limited to 30 degrees or less, or radius or ulna malunion with bad alignment is documented.

What separates the next level: Higher pathways may require flexion limited to 90 degrees, extension limited to 75 degrees, stronger pronation loss, nonunion, ankylosis, or other structural findings.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
DC 5206 lists flexion limited to 100 degrees at 10 percent. DC 5207 lists extension limited to 45 or 60 degrees at 10 percent. DC 5211 and DC 5212 list malunion with bad alignment at 10 percent. DC 5213 lists supination limited to 30 degrees or less at 10 percent.
Qualification explanation
These are separate routes. RatingScope should not blend an elbow motion finding with a radius, ulna, or rotation finding unless the record documents that specific route.
Examples
Flexion is documented at 100 degrees.; Extension is documented as limited to 45 or 60 degrees.; Supination is limited to 30 degrees or less.; Radius or ulna malunion with bad alignment is documented.
Medical evidence
Elbow and Forearm DBQ range-of-motion section; Pronation and supination measurements; X-ray or orthopedic imaging; Treatment notes describing current alignment
Functional impact examples
Difficulty bringing food or tools toward the body when flexion is limited.; Difficulty straightening the elbow for reaching, pushing, or bracing.; Difficulty turning the palm up or down during daily tasks.
Common misconceptions
A painful elbow does not identify which 10% route applies.; Supination and pronation are forearm rotation findings, not the same as elbow flexion.; A past fracture history is not the same as current malunion.
Related topics
flexion 100 degrees; extension 45 degrees; extension 60 degrees; supination; malunion
Source context
38 CFR 4.71a; 5206, 5207, 5211, 5212, and 5213; Current educational Elbow / Forearm guide; deterministic assessment support is not active.

20%

Next: 30% major / 20% minor

The 20% level can describe flexion limited to 90 degrees, extension limited to 75 degrees, flexion limited to 100 degrees with extension limited to 45 degrees, certain pronation findings, joint fracture deformity, or a lower-severity (non-false-movement) nonunion finding for the radius or ulna.

What separates the next level: The next motion levels ask for flexion limited to 70 degrees or extension limited to 90 degrees, with dominant-side differences beginning on some routes.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
DC 5206 lists flexion limited to 90 degrees at 20 percent. DC 5207 lists extension limited to 75 degrees at 20 percent. DC 5208 lists flexion limited to 100 degrees and extension to 45 degrees at 20 percent. DC 5209 and DC 5211-5213 include additional 20 percent pathways for qualifying fracture, nonunion, pronation, or bone-fusion findings (DC 5210 has no 20 percent tier -- its only rating is 50 percent major / 40 percent minor).
Qualification explanation
A 20% explanation must identify the route: bending, straightening, combined motion, fracture deformity, radius or ulna impairment, or forearm rotation. These findings should not be treated as interchangeable.
Examples
Flexion is measured at 90 degrees.; Extension is limited to 75 degrees.; Flexion is limited to 100 degrees and extension to 45 degrees in the same record.; Pronation is lost beyond the last quarter of the arc and the hand does not approach full pronation.
Medical evidence
Measured flexion and extension; Pronation and supination findings; Imaging or specialist notes for fracture deformity; Radius or ulna nonunion documentation
Functional impact examples
Trouble pushing, pulling, or reaching when extension is limited.; Difficulty lifting or carrying when elbow bending is restricted.; Tool use, turning doorknobs, eating, or grooming limits when rotation is affected.
Common misconceptions
The combined 20% route requires both flexion and extension findings.; A fracture history alone is not the same as the listed fracture deformity route.; A dominant-arm percentage difference should not be assumed when the route lists the same value for both sides.
Related topics
flexion 90 degrees; extension 75 degrees; combined motion; pronation; nonunion
Source context
38 CFR 4.71a; 5206, 5207, 5208, 5209, 5211, 5212, and 5213; Current educational Elbow / Forearm guide; deterministic assessment support is not active.

30% major / 20% minor

Next: 40% major / 30% minor

Some elbow and forearm findings differ by dominant side. This range can include flexion limited to 70 degrees, extension limited to 90 degrees, pronation lost beyond the middle of the arc, or certain radius or ulna nonunion findings depending on side.

What separates the next level: Higher levels usually require stronger flexion or extension limitation, ankylosis, flail joint, prosthetic replacement residuals, or more severe bone impairment.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
DC 5206 lists flexion limited to 70 degrees at 30 percent for the major extremity and 20 percent for the minor extremity. DC 5207 lists extension limited to 90 degrees at 30 percent major and 20 percent minor. DC 5213 lists pronation lost beyond the middle of the arc at 30 percent major and 20 percent minor. DC 5211 lists nonunion in the upper half of the ulna with false movement, without loss of bone substance or deformity, at 30 percent major and 20 percent minor. DC 5212 lists nonunion in the lower half of the radius with false movement, without loss of bone substance or deformity, at 30 percent major and 20 percent minor.
Qualification explanation
The record needs the affected side and whether it is the dominant extremity when the schedule separates major and minor values. RatingScope should not guess dominance.
Examples
The dominant elbow has flexion limited to 70 degrees.; The nondominant elbow has extension limited to 90 degrees.; The dominant forearm has pronation lost beyond the middle of the arc.; Radius or ulna nonunion without loss of bone substance or deformity is documented on the side where the schedule distinguishes major and minor values.
Medical evidence
Dominant-hand documentation; Elbow and Forearm DBQ; Flexion, extension, pronation, and supination measurements; Imaging describing radius or ulna nonunion
Functional impact examples
Dominant-side limits may affect writing, tools, lifting, carrying, pushing, and pulling.; Nondominant-side limits may still affect dressing, grooming, carrying, and two-handed tasks.; Forearm rotation limits can affect palm-up and palm-down activities even when elbow flexion remains partly preserved.
Common misconceptions
Right arm is not always the major extremity.; Dominant and nondominant criteria are not interchangeable.; Forearm rotation should not be confused with shoulder rotation.
Related topics
dominant arm; minor extremity; flexion 70 degrees; extension 90 degrees; pronation
Source context
38 CFR 4.71a; 5206, 5207, 5211, 5212, and 5213; Current educational Elbow / Forearm guide; deterministic assessment support is not active.

40% major / 30% minor

Next: 50% major / 40% minor

This range can describe flexion limited to 55 degrees, extension limited to 100 degrees, favorable elbow ankylosis, severe radius or ulna nonunion findings, or hand fixed in supination or hyperpronation depending on side and route.

What separates the next level: Higher levels usually require flexion limited to 45 degrees, extension limited to 110 degrees, intermediate or unfavorable ankylosis, flail joint, nonunion of radius and ulna, or chronic severe residuals after elbow replacement.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
DC 5206 lists flexion limited to 55 degrees at 40 percent major and 30 percent minor. DC 5207 lists extension limited to 100 degrees at 40 percent major and 30 percent minor. DC 5205 lists favorable elbow ankylosis at 40 percent major and 30 percent minor. DC 5211-5213 include additional structural or rotation pathways at these levels.
Qualification explanation
The record must identify the actual pathway. Very painful motion is not automatically a 55-degree flexion limit, a 100-degree extension limit, ankylosis, or severe radius or ulna nonunion.
Examples
Dominant elbow flexion is limited to 55 degrees.; Nondominant elbow extension is limited to 100 degrees.; Favorable ankylosis fixes the elbow between 90 and 70 degrees.; The hand is fixed in supination or hyperpronation with the affected side documented.
Medical evidence
Elbow DBQ ankylosis section; Range-of-motion measurements; Pronation and supination findings; Imaging showing radius or ulna nonunion, bone loss, or deformity
Functional impact examples
Marked difficulty eating, grooming, lifting, or carrying when elbow bending is substantially limited.; Difficulty reaching forward or pushing when extension is substantially limited.; Loss of rotation affecting tool use, driving controls, or palm-up/palm-down tasks.
Common misconceptions
Stiffness is not automatically ankylosis.; Pain at the end of movement is not the same as the measured endpoint.; Bone-loss and deformity language should come from medical records, not assumption.
Related topics
flexion 55 degrees; extension 100 degrees; favorable ankylosis; radius; ulna; supination
Source context
38 CFR 4.71a; 5205, 5206, 5207, 5211, 5212, and 5213; Current educational Elbow / Forearm guide; deterministic assessment support is not active.

50% major / 40% minor

Next: 60% major / 50% minor

This range can involve flexion limited to 45 degrees, extension limited to 110 degrees, intermediate elbow ankylosis, nonunion of the radius and ulna with flail false joint, or chronic residuals after elbow replacement depending on route and side.

What separates the next level: The higher listed elbow ankylosis or flail-joint routes require unfavorable ankylosis or flail joint findings under their own diagnostic codes.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
DC 5206 lists flexion limited to 45 degrees at 50 percent major and 40 percent minor. DC 5207 lists extension limited to 110 degrees at 50 percent major and 40 percent minor. DC 5205 lists intermediate ankylosis at 50 percent major and 40 percent minor. DC 5210 lists radius and ulna nonunion with flail false joint at 50 percent major and 40 percent minor. DC 5052 lists chronic severe residuals after elbow replacement at 50 percent major and 40 percent minor.
Qualification explanation
This is a high-severity range, but the explanation still has to stay route-specific. Replacement residuals, flail false joint, ankylosis, flexion, and extension are different findings.
Examples
Dominant elbow flexion is limited to 45 degrees.; Nondominant elbow extension is limited to 110 degrees.; Intermediate ankylosis fixes the elbow at more than 90 degrees or between 70 and 50 degrees.; Radius and ulna nonunion with flail false joint is documented.
Medical evidence
Elbow and Forearm DBQ; Operative report for elbow replacement; Orthopedic imaging; Ankylosis and range-of-motion findings
Functional impact examples
Severe limits with bending or straightening that affect dressing, grooming, lifting, and occupational tasks.; Severe painful motion or weakness after elbow replacement when documented after the relevant period.; Instability or flail-joint effects tied to documented radius and ulna findings.
Common misconceptions
Any elbow surgery is not the same as prosthetic elbow replacement.; Severe pain is not automatically intermediate ankylosis.; A general fracture history does not establish radius and ulna nonunion with flail false joint.
Related topics
flexion 45 degrees; extension 110 degrees; intermediate ankylosis; flail false joint; elbow replacement
Source context
38 CFR 4.71a; 5052, 5205, 5206, 5207, and 5210; Current educational Elbow / Forearm guide; deterministic assessment support is not active.

60% major / 50% minor

Next: 100% temporary

The 60% major / 50% minor range can describe unfavorable elbow ankylosis or flail joint under the elbow and forearm schedule.

What separates the next level: A temporary 100% level may apply after qualifying elbow prosthesis implantation under DC 5052, but that is based on procedure timing rather than permanent severity comparison. Separately, if multiple finger movements are also impaired due to tendon tie-up, muscle, or nerve injury, RatingScope flags that finding as an active cross-reference disclosure to the Hand/Fingers hub's own DC 5216-5230 findings, combined and capped at DC 5125's loss-of-use-of-hand figure, rather than leaving it as passive regulation text.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
DC 5205 lists unfavorable elbow ankylosis at an angle of less than 50 degrees or with complete loss of supination or pronation at 60 percent major and 50 percent minor. DC 5209 lists elbow flail joint at 60 percent major and 50 percent minor.
Qualification explanation
The record should document the fixed angle, complete rotation loss, or flail joint finding. RatingScope should not infer these findings from pain, weakness, instability language, or limited motion alone.
Examples
Unfavorable ankylosis fixes the elbow at less than 50 degrees.; There is complete loss of supination or pronation with ankylosis context.; A flail elbow joint is documented under the elbow impairment route.
Medical evidence
Ankylosis findings with fixed angle; Pronation and supination findings; Orthopedic specialist records; Imaging or operative records documenting flail joint
Functional impact examples
Major loss of practical elbow position for reaching, lifting, eating, dressing, and grooming.; Severe forearm rotation limits that affect tool use, containers, handles, and palm orientation.; Work-task limitations tied to a documented fixed-position or flail-joint finding.
Common misconceptions
Very limited motion is not automatically ankylosis.; Instability is not automatically flail joint.; Complete rotation loss should not be inferred from pain with rotation.
Related topics
unfavorable ankylosis; flail joint; complete loss of pronation; complete loss of supination
Source context
38 CFR 4.71a; 5205 and 5209; Current educational Elbow / Forearm guide; deterministic assessment support is not active.

100% temporary

Highest listed pathway

DC 5052 provides a temporary 100% level for one year following implantation of an elbow prosthesis.

What separates the next level: After the one-year period, chronic severe painful motion or weakness is listed at 50% major / 40% minor, and minimum evaluation is 30% major / 20% minor. For intermediate degrees of residual weakness, pain, or limitation of motion, DC 5052 directs examiners to rate by analogy to DC 5205 through 5208, but the regulation does not specify how a given prosthetic-residual finding should map onto those four differently-structured motion codes (DC 5205 covers elbow ankylosis, DC 5206 covers forearm flexion, DC 5207 covers forearm extension, and DC 5208 covers combined flexion and extension). This is an open cross-reference judgment call the regulation leaves to the examiner, not a fully specified rule, and RatingScope does not resolve it.

Review CFR criteria, examples, and evidence
Official CFR language
DC 5052 lists prosthetic replacement of the elbow joint at 100 percent for one year following implantation of the prosthesis.
Qualification explanation
The procedure type and timing must be explicit. After the temporary period, elbow replacement residuals are evaluated using the chronic-residual or analogy instructions in the schedule.
Examples
An elbow prosthesis was implanted within the one-year period.; The operative report identifies prosthetic replacement of the elbow joint.; Follow-up records document the procedure date and recovery period.
Medical evidence
Operative report; Procedure date; Postoperative follow-up records; Elbow replacement residual findings
Functional impact examples
Postoperative recovery occurs during the schedule-defined temporary period.; Later residual function is evaluated after the temporary period.; Painful motion and weakness matter after the post-procedure period when documented.
Common misconceptions
The temporary 100% route is not permanent by default.; A general elbow surgery is not automatically prosthetic replacement.; Procedure timing should not be guessed.
Related topics
DC 5052; elbow prosthesis; temporary post-procedure period; replacement residuals
Source context
38 CFR 4.71a; 5052; Current educational Elbow / Forearm guide; deterministic assessment support is not active.

Learn

Understand the details behind the criteria

Use these short guides to connect published terms with the records and observations that may clarify them.

Finger movements impaired by an elbow/forearm injury: separately rated and combined, capped at loss-of-use-of-hand

The Note following DC 5213 states: in all the forearm and wrist injuries, codes 5205 through 5213, multiple impaired finger movements due to tendon tie-up, muscle, or nerve injury are separately rated and combined, not to exceed the rating for loss of use of the hand (DC 5125).

  • This is a real, CFR-based combination rule distinct from the general same-joint pyramiding caution already disclosed in this hub's bilateral-elbows content.
  • The Hand/Fingers hub's own DC 5125 (loss of use of the hand) content is the applicable ceiling for this specific combination.
  • This Note applies across the whole DC 5205-5213 range, not just DC 5213 itself.

Records to review: Elbow/forearm and hand/finger DBQ documentation of tendon, muscle, or nerve-related finger movement impairment.

Elbow flexion and extension measurements

Elbow flexion measures bending. Elbow extension measures how far the elbow lacks full straightening.

  • Flexion is the bending movement that brings the forearm toward the upper arm.
  • Extension is the straightening movement; the schedule lists extension limitation by the degree of lost straightening.
  • DC 5206 and DC 5207 use different measurement paths, so one number should not be substituted for the other.
  • DC 5208 uses a combined route only when flexion is limited to 100 degrees and extension is limited to 45 degrees.

Records to review: Elbow and Forearm DBQ; range-of-motion examination; physical therapy measurements.

Forearm pronation, supination, and functional loss

Pronation and supination describe forearm rotation, not shoulder rotation or elbow bending.

  • Supination turns the palm upward, such as holding a bowl or receiving an object.
  • Pronation turns the palm downward, such as typing, using tools, or placing the hand flat.
  • DC 5213 includes routes for limited pronation, limited supination, and bone-fusion positions of the hand.
  • Pain, weakness, fatigability, or flare-ups may matter when they affect documented motion or function, but RatingScope does not invent missing rotation findings.

Records to review: DBQ pronation and supination findings; goniometer measurements; functional-impact notes.

Why dominant and nondominant side matter

Several elbow and forearm percentages differ depending on whether the affected extremity is major or minor.

  • Major usually means the dominant upper extremity.
  • Minor usually means the nondominant upper extremity.
  • The affected side and dominance should be documented rather than guessed.
  • Bilateral elbow or forearm issues still need side-specific findings.

Records to review: DBQ dominant-hand section; clinical history; veteran statement when appropriate.

How radius and ulna impairment differs from motion limits

Radius and ulna pathways focus on bone alignment, nonunion, false movement, bone loss, deformity, or flail false joint.

  • The radius and ulna are the two forearm bones.
  • Malunion, nonunion, false movement, bone substance loss, deformity, and flail false joint are medical findings.
  • A past fracture does not automatically establish a current radius or ulna pathway.
  • Imaging and orthopedic records usually matter more than symptom labels for these routes.
  • The Elbow and Forearm DBQ's own radius impairment checklist mislabels its upper and lower tiers -- it mirrors the ulna checklist's structure (upper half as the more severe finding), which is backwards from the published DC 5212 regulation text (lower half is the more severe finding for the radius). RatingScope follows the published regulation text, not the DBQ's checkbox labeling, for this specific finding.

Records to review: X-ray; MRI or CT when available; orthopedic notes; operative records.

When both elbows are involved

Both elbows may have documented findings, but each side still needs its own measurements and affected-side context.

  • Left and right elbow findings should not be blended into one measurement.
  • Dominant-side status can change the percentage pathway for one side.
  • Separate same-joint manifestations still have to respect VA rules against overlapping evaluation of the same disability manifestation.
  • RatingScope does not combine or calculate elbow outcomes in this education-only hub.

Records to review: left and right DBQ measurements; dominant-side documentation; bilateral treatment notes.

Flare-ups, repeated use, and functional loss

Elbow and forearm function can change with repeated use, flare-ups, pain, weakness, fatigability, incoordination, or lack of endurance.

  • The DBQ may ask how flare-ups affect movement and ordinary tasks.
  • Repeated-use findings may identify whether motion changes after repetitive testing or over time.
  • Functional impact can include lifting, carrying, pushing, pulling, gripping, tool use, dressing, grooming, and repetitive work tasks.
  • RatingScope uses functional-loss language as educational context and does not infer absent medical findings.

Records to review: DBQ flare-up section; repeated-use testing; treatment notes; lay descriptions of functional impact.

Measurement Guide

How elbow and forearm movement is measured

Measurements should come from medical records, examinations, DBQs, or other documented clinical findings. RatingScope does not estimate motion from symptoms.

Elbow flexion

Flexion is elbow bending, such as bringing your hand toward your shoulder.

Normal reference: The DBQ commonly references elbow flexion to 145 degrees.

Why it matters: DC 5206 uses flexion endpoints to distinguish several elbow pathways.

Elbow extension

Extension is elbow straightening. The schedule describes limitation by how many degrees full straightening is lost.

Normal reference: Full extension is commonly referenced as 0 degrees.

Why it matters: DC 5207 uses extension limitation to distinguish several elbow pathways.

Forearm pronation

Pronation rotates the forearm so the palm turns downward.

Normal reference: The DBQ records pronation as a forearm rotation measurement.

Why it matters: DC 5213 includes pathways for limited pronation and fixed hand positions.

Forearm supination

Supination rotates the forearm so the palm turns upward.

Normal reference: The DBQ records supination as a forearm rotation measurement.

Why it matters: DC 5213 includes a route for supination limited to 30 degrees or less.

How an examination adds context

Dominant hand
The examiner may record whether the affected extremity is dominant because several percentages differ for major and minor extremities.
Active and passive motion
Records may distinguish motion the veteran performs from motion the examiner moves through passively.
Repeated-use testing
The DBQ may ask whether repeated use causes additional loss of function or range of motion.
Flare-ups
Flare-up descriptions help explain whether function changes during worse episodes, but they should not be converted into measurements unless documented.
Painful motion
Pain can matter when it affects documented function or motion. RatingScope does not treat pain as a stand-alone rating calculation.

Evidence

Evidence that may clarify the published criteria

Elbow and Forearm DBQ

The DBQ organizes diagnosis, dominant side, flexion, extension, pronation, supination, pain, ankylosis, radius or ulna findings, replacement history, and functional impact.

A DBQ is useful context, but RatingScope does not require uploads and this hub does not accept records.

Diagnosis and treatment records

Treatment notes can show the current condition, course over time, therapy, medication, brace use, surgery, and clinician observations.

A diagnosis alone does not identify which percentage pathway applies.

X-rays, MRI, CT, or operative imaging

Imaging may help document radius or ulna malunion, nonunion, bone loss, deformity, fracture history, or other structural findings.

Imaging severity should not be substituted for a route-specific CFR finding.

Range-of-motion measurements

Flexion, extension, pronation, and supination measurements help clarify which motion pathway is being discussed.

RatingScope does not estimate degrees from words such as stiff, sore, or limited.

Dominant-hand documentation

Dominance helps separate major and minor extremity criteria where the schedule lists different percentages.

Dominance should not be guessed from right or left side alone.

Fracture, dislocation, surgery, or replacement records

Operative and orthopedic records can clarify flail joint, fracture deformity, radius or ulna nonunion, elbow replacement, and timing after implantation.

A general surgery history is not the same as a qualifying prosthetic replacement or structural finding.

Personal and firsthand lay evidence

Plain descriptions can explain lifting, carrying, pushing, pulling, gripping, dressing, grooming, tool use, and flare-up impact.

Lay evidence can describe observed impact, but it should not invent medical measurements or diagnoses.

Functional-loss descriptions

Records describing pain, weakness, fatigability, incoordination, lack of endurance, flare-ups, or repeated-use limits help connect symptoms to function.

Functional loss is context; it does not let RatingScope infer absent CFR findings.

Official VA Forms & DBQs

Downloadable DBQs & Supporting Claim Forms

Take the public DBQ to your private physician or review it prior to your C&P examination.

Terminology

Plain-English terms

Painful motion

Movement hurts, especially during bending, straightening, or rotation.

Pain may help explain functional loss, but RatingScope does not convert pain into a private rating calculation.

DBQ pain findings; treatment notes

Radius and ulna

The forearm bones that can have alignment, nonunion, bone loss, deformity, or false-joint findings.

DC 5210 through 5212 use radius and ulna findings separate from elbow motion measurements.

imaging; orthopedic records

TDIU

Even if the schedular rating for Elbow / Forearm does not reach 100 percent, TDIU may still provide a pathway to compensation at the 100 percent rate, based on unemployability from this and/or other service-connected disabilities combined.

A lower schedular percentage does not by itself foreclose TDIU eligibility -- this hub computes only the schedular percentage for this specific condition and does not determine TDIU eligibility.

Employment history; vocational impact documentation; occupational impairment

Common Questions

Questions veterans commonly ask

Why does elbow motion use two different measurements?

Flexion describes bending and extension describes straightening. The schedule places them in separate diagnostic code pathways, so one measurement should not replace the other.

What is the difference between elbow motion and forearm rotation?

Elbow motion is bending and straightening. Forearm rotation is pronation and supination, which turn the palm down or up. VA lists those pathways separately.

Does pain automatically increase an elbow percentage?

Pain matters when it affects documented motion or function, but pain by itself does not identify a route. The record still needs the specific finding the schedule asks about.

Does dominant hand matter for elbow and forearm conditions?

It can. Several levels distinguish major and minor extremity values, so records should identify the affected side and whether that side is dominant.

Can both elbows be evaluated separately?

Both sides may have separate documented findings, but left and right measurements should not be blended. Overlapping same-joint manifestations still have to respect VA rules against pyramiding.

Does imaging decide the percentage?

Imaging can be important for radius, ulna, fracture, nonunion, malunion, deformity, or replacement routes, but imaging language should not replace measured motion or other route-specific criteria.

What if my symptoms get worse with repeated use?

Repeated-use and flare-up descriptions can explain functional loss. RatingScope does not turn those descriptions into measurements unless the record documents the needed finding.

Is this an active RatingScope assessment?

No. This Elbow / Forearm hub is educational only. Do not enter elbow findings into another condition's assessment.

If my schedular rating for Elbow / Forearm is below 100%, can I still be compensated at the 100% rate?

Possibly, through TDIU (Total Disability rating based on Individual Unemployability, 38 CFR 4.16) -- a separate pathway to 100 percent compensation based on unemployability, from this and/or other service-connected disabilities combined, independent of whether the schedular rating itself reaches 100 percent. This hub computes only the schedular percentage and does not determine TDIU eligibility.

What separates the 0% rating from adjacent levels?

The next flexion level asks whether flexion is limited to 100 degrees. Other elbow and forearm routes use different findings.

What separates the 10% rating from adjacent levels?

Higher pathways may require flexion limited to 90 degrees, extension limited to 75 degrees, stronger pronation loss, nonunion, ankylosis, or other structural findings.

What separates the 20% rating from adjacent levels?

The next motion levels ask for flexion limited to 70 degrees or extension limited to 90 degrees, with dominant-side differences beginning on some routes.

What separates the 30% major / 20% minor rating from adjacent levels?

Higher levels usually require stronger flexion or extension limitation, ankylosis, flail joint, prosthetic replacement residuals, or more severe bone impairment.

What separates the 40% major / 30% minor rating from adjacent levels?

Higher levels usually require flexion limited to 45 degrees, extension limited to 110 degrees, intermediate or unfavorable ankylosis, flail joint, nonunion of radius and ulna, or chronic severe residuals after elbow replacement.

What separates the 50% major / 40% minor rating from adjacent levels?

The higher listed elbow ankylosis or flail-joint routes require unfavorable ankylosis or flail joint findings under their own diagnostic codes.

What separates the 60% major / 50% minor rating from adjacent levels?

A temporary 100% level may apply after qualifying elbow prosthesis implantation under DC 5052, but that is based on procedure timing rather than permanent severity comparison. Separately, if multiple finger movements are also impaired due to tendon tie-up, muscle, or nerve injury, RatingScope flags that finding as an active cross-reference disclosure to the Hand/Fingers hub's own DC 5216-5230 findings, combined and capped at DC 5125's loss-of-use-of-hand figure, rather than leaving it as passive regulation text.

What separates the 100% temporary rating from adjacent levels?

After the one-year period, chronic severe painful motion or weakness is listed at 50% major / 40% minor, and minimum evaluation is 30% major / 20% minor. For intermediate degrees of residual weakness, pain, or limitation of motion, DC 5052 directs examiners to rate by analogy to DC 5205 through 5208, but the regulation does not specify how a given prosthetic-residual finding should map onto those four differently-structured motion codes (DC 5205 covers elbow ankylosis, DC 5206 covers forearm flexion, DC 5207 covers forearm extension, and DC 5208 covers combined flexion and extension). This is an open cross-reference judgment call the regulation leaves to the examiner, not a fully specified rule, and RatingScope does not resolve it.

Ready when you are

Compare documented elbow and forearm findings

Use diagnosis, flexion and extension measurements, dominant-side status, and replacement or radius/ulna impairment history already documented in your records. Do not upload records or enter Social Security numbers, claim numbers, full dates of birth, or other sensitive identifiers. RatingScope does not infer missing medical findings or predict a VA decision.

Informational guidance only. RatingScope does not predict, decide, or guarantee VA outcomes.

Compare my Elbow / Forearm records

Learn More

Continue Understanding

External source/reference

38 CFR 4.71a - The Elbow and Forearm

Official regulation source for DC 5052 and DC 5205-5213. Use the official source for current rule text.

Open 38 CFR 4.71a - The Elbow and Forearm

RatingScope resource

Claims Process - C&P exams

Educational context for what a C&P exam is and how exam evidence is organized.

Open Claims Process - C&P exams

RatingScope resource

Claims Process - Evidence Center

Educational context for evidence categories such as DBQs, treatment records, imaging, and lay statements.

Open Claims Process - Evidence Center

RatingScope resource

Shoulder / Arm guide

Nearby upper-extremity guidance that remains separate from elbow and forearm criteria.

Open Shoulder / Arm guide

Secondary conditions

Conditions commonly connected to Elbow / Forearm

This reflects regulatory and clinical relationships already explained elsewhere on this site. It is not a diagnosis, not a prediction that you have or will develop a connected condition, and not personalized medical or legal advice.

Educational relationship

Elbow / Forearm Neck / Cervical Spine

Neck findings may be relevant when arm symptoms are neurologic or spine-related rather than elbow-joint findings.

View Neck / Cervical Spine

Keep going

Compare a percentage level and combined-rating math, or review evidence context.

See all tools

VA Math & Combined Ratings

Understand the whole-person method, final rounding, and bilateral limits, then calculate how percentages combine.

Open VA Math guide

Evidence Center

Understand common evidence categories and what they can clarify without treating them as a checklist.

Open Evidence Center